How these gibbering numbskulls came to dominate Washington

Print Friendly

By George Monbiot  | [print_link]

Like the late Jerry Falwell, and, not too long ago, the now unmasked Jimmy Swaggart, Jimmy Bakker, and Ted haggard, the notorious charlatan and mind poisoner James Dobson currently enjoys an enormous power base. The Louisiana-born fundamentalist evangelist produces the daily radio program Focus on the Family, which is broadcast in more than a dozen languages and on over 7,000 stations worldwide, and heard daily by more than 220 million people in 164 countries, according to the organization’s own statements.[2][3] Focus on the Family is also carried by about 60 U.S. television stations daily. Such sources of virulent stupidity are all too common in America, and when we add a broken educational system, a prostituted political class, and a media devoted to escapism and political lies, it’s a wonder the American population is still capable of making semi-decent decisions.—Eds.

The degradation of intelligence and learning in American politics results from a series of interlocking tragedies

The Guardian, Tuesday October 28 2008

This Cyrano post includes select original comments from The Guardian edition.

How was it allowed to happen? How did politics in the US come to be dominated by people who make a virtue out of ignorance? Was it charity that has permitted mankind’s closest living relative to spend two terms as president? How did Sarah Palin, Dan Quayle and other such gibbering numbskulls get to where they are? How could Republican rallies in 2008 be drowned out by screaming ignoramuses insisting that Barack Obama was a Muslim and a terrorist?

Like most people on my side of the Atlantic, I have for many years been mystified by American politics. The US has the world’s best universities and attracts the world’s finest minds. It dominates discoveries in science and medicine. Its wealth and power depend on the application of knowledge. Yet, uniquely among the developed nations (with the possible exception of Australia), learning is a grave political disadvantage.

There have been exceptions over the past century – Franklin Roosevelt, JF Kennedy and Bill Clinton tempered their intellectualism with the common touch and survived – but Adlai Stevenson, Al Gore and John Kerry were successfully tarred by their opponents as members of a cerebral elite (as if this were not a qualification for the presidency). Perhaps the defining moment in the collapse of intelligent politics was Ronald Reagan’s response to Jimmy Carter during the 1980 presidential debate. Carter – stumbling a little, using long words – carefully enumerated the benefits of national health insurance. Reagan smiled and said: “There you go again.” His own health programme would have appalled most Americans, had he explained it as carefully as Carter had done, but he had found a formula for avoiding tough political issues and making his opponents look like wonks.

It wasn’t always like this. The founding fathers of the republic – Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, John Adams, Alexander Hamilton and others – were among the greatest thinkers of their age. They felt no need to make a secret of it. How did the project they launched degenerate into George W Bush and Sarah Palin?

Jefferson would be appalled at the degeneracy of the aristocratic republic he and others envisioned, were he to set eyes on today’s America. But, lest we forget, much of the trouble originates in the mendacity and inequality inherent in a “bourgeois democracy” idea, where the bourgeois tail wags the democratic dog at all times, in the interest of a highly concentrated group of wealthholders.

On one level, this is easy to answer. Ignorant politicians are elected by ignorant people. US education, like the US health system, is notorious for its failures. In the most powerful nation on earth, one adult in five believes the sun revolves round the earth; only 26% accept that evolution takes place by means of natural selection; two-thirds of young adults are unable to find Iraq on a map; two-thirds of US voters cannot name the three branches of government; the maths skills of 15-year-olds in the US are ranked 24th out of the 29 countries of the OECD. But this merely extends the mystery: how did so many US citizens become so stupid, and so suspicious of intelligence? Susan Jacoby’s book The Age of American Unreason provides the fullest explanation I have read so far. She shows that the degradation of US politics results from a series of interlocking tragedies.

One theme is both familiar and clear: religion – in particular fundamentalist religion – makes you stupid. The US is the only rich country in which Christian fundamentalism is vast and growing.

Jacoby shows that there was once a certain logic to its anti-rationalism. During the first few decades after the publication of The Origin of Species, for instance, Americans had good reason to reject the theory of natural selection and to treat public intellectuals with suspicion. From the beginning, Darwin’s theory was mixed up in the US with the brutal philosophy – now known as social Darwinism – of the British writer Herbert Spencer. Spencer’s doctrine, promoted in the popular press with the help of funding from Andrew Carnegie, John D Rockefeller and Thomas Edison, suggested that millionaires stood at the top of a scala natura established by evolution. By preventing unfit people being weeded out, government intervention weakened the nation. Gross economic inequalities were both justifiable and necessary.

Frederick Eikerenkoetter, aka “Rev. Ike”. Although most crooked preachers have been and continue to be white Southern Baptists, African Americans are not spared the religiosity plague. A confirmed follower of Mammon, Rev Ike has stated that he owns a fleet of Rolls-Royces (a different color for every day of the week, appointed in mink), diamond rings, expensive suits, and multiple mansions as a sign of divine approval of his crass materialism. Thus, far from hiding his wealth, Reverend Ike makes it a point of his preaching. His theology centers around the “Science of Living” and “Thinkonomics,” his own version of economics based on the premise that poverty, a lack of luck, poor health, etc., are the result of incorrect attitudes, a lack of confidence, a lack of faith and a failure to get in touch with the “presence of God within each of us.” “Unlearning” these attitudes, according to Reverend Ike, leads to wealth and health and his own flamboyant prosperity, and that of some of his followers, is, he claims, evidence of this. (His television programs, for instance, used to include the “Blessing of the Cadillacs,” where prosperous congregants were invited to drive their luxury cars past the church’s doors for his laying on of hands.)

Darwinism, in other words, became indistinguishable from the most bestial form of laissez-faire economics. Many Christians responded with revulsion. It is profoundly ironic that the doctrine rejected a century ago by such prominent fundamentalists as William Jennings Bryan is now central to the economic thinking of the Christian right. Modern fundamentalists reject the science of Darwinian evolution and accept the pseudoscience of social Darwinism.

But there were other, more powerful, reasons for the intellectual isolation of the fundamentalists. The US is peculiar in devolving the control of education to local authorities. Teaching in the southern states was dominated by the views of an ignorant aristocracy of planters, and a great educational gulf opened up. “In the south”, Jacoby writes, “what can only be described as an intellectual blockade was imposed in order to keep out any ideas that might threaten the social order.”

The Southern Baptist Convention, now the biggest denomination in the US, was to slavery and segregation what the Dutch Reformed Church was to apartheid in South Africa. It has done more than any other force to keep the south stupid. In the 1960s it tried to stave off desegregation by establishing a system of private Christian schools and universities. A student can now progress from kindergarten to a higher degree without any exposure to secular teaching. Southern Baptist beliefs pass intact through the public school system as well. A survey by researchers at the University of Texas in 1998 found that one in four of the state’s state school biology teachers believed humans and dinosaurs lived on earth at the same time.

Jimmy Swaggart’s stardom from religious telecasts and packed arena revivals was overshadowed when he was caught patronizing a prostitute and made a teary, televised confession. At age 8, he drew his poor, rural Louisiana town’s attention when he mystically spoke in foreign tongues and uttered prophecies at a Pentecostal church revival. As a teenage evangelist and later as a pastor and traveling preacher, he used his commanding stage presence to emphasize submission to Jesus as the only way to escape human bondage to sin and Satan. By the 1980s, his Baton Rouge church had its own broadcast and publishing operations and a college. After the 1987 incident with New Orleans prostitute Debra Murphree was revealed in 1988, Swaggart’s ministerial credentials were revoked by his denomination, the Assemblies of God. He apparently “sinned” again, for in in 1991 he was caught once more with a prostitute, this time in Los Angeles. Another teary mea culpa followed. How huge audiences continue to believe in and support such transparent con artists is a mystery that puzzles most Europeans and foreigners in general.

This tragedy has been assisted by the American fetishisation of self-education. Though he greatly regretted his lack of formal teaching, Abraham Lincoln’s career is repeatedly cited as evidence that good education, provided by the state, is unnecessary: all that is required to succeed is determination and rugged individualism. This might have served people well when genuine self-education movements, like the one built around the Little Blue Books in the first half of the 20th century, were in vogue. In the age of infotainment, it is a recipe for confusion.

Besides fundamentalist religion, perhaps the most potent reason intellectuals struggle in elections is that intellectualism has been equated with subversion. The brief flirtation of some thinkers with communism a long time ago has been used to create an impression in the public mind that all intellectuals are communists. Almost every day men such as Rush Limbaugh and Bill O’Reilly rage against the “liberal elites” destroying America.

The spectre of pointy-headed alien subversives was crucial to the election of Reagan and Bush. A genuine intellectual elite – like the neocons (some of them former communists) surrounding Bush – has managed to pitch the political conflict as a battle between ordinary Americans and an over-educated pinko establishment. Any attempt to challenge the ideas of the rightwing elite has been successfully branded as elitism.

Obama has a lot to offer the US, but none of this will stop if he wins. Until the great failures of the US education system are reversed or religious fundamentalism withers, there will be political opportunities for people, like Bush and Palin, who flaunt their ignorance.

George Monbiot is the author of the bestselling books The Age of Consent: A Manifesto for a New World Order and Captive State: The Corporate Takeover of Britain, as well as the investigative travel books Poisoned Arrows, Amazon Watershed and No Man’s Land.

See also: monbiot.com

2 comments on “How these gibbering numbskulls came to dominate Washington
  1. Susannah27
    Oct 28 08, 12:28am (about 17 hours ago)

    It seems to me that you’re letting some cynical bad guys off the hook. This didn’t just happen…it was planned. The Republican elite doesn’t believe this stuff for a minute. It suits their agenda to assure its widespread acceptance but their children go to “the best schools” It’s far worse than you think.

    Recommend? (74)
    Report abuse
    Clip | Link
    Beckovsky
    Oct 28 08, 12:33am (about 17 hours ago)

    First of all, why omit John McCain from the list of numbskulls running Washington? McCain is both less educated and obviously dumber than even the much maligned George Bush.

    Regarding anti-elitism in America: it’s not just the social Darwinism, there are many other perfectly good reasons why the masses in America mistrust their educated “betters”. The elite university institutions in America are much more legacy oriented and thus less meritocratic than similar institutions around the world. Wealth and connections still buys admission to Ivy League schools, and therefore makes their claims suspect. Let’s not forget that George Bush went to Yale and has a graduate degree from Harvard.

    The educated elites in America have also been pushing a number of totally selfish policies that clearly hurt majority of Americans, but benefit these very elites. Everything from globalization (no dissent allowed!!), affirmative action, soft criminal justice system policies, importing working class, multi-cultural fantasies, foreign interventionism, etc… Who can blame the poor out-played American lower classes for lashing out in the only way they can by supporting Palin when they have a chance?

    Recommend? (29)
    Report abuse
    Clip | Link
    icarus80
    Oct 28 08, 12:34am (about 17 hours ago)

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
    martinusher
    Oct 28 08, 12:37am (about 17 hours ago)

    Its not as clear cut as it looks. Think of government as two tier — you’ve got the populist front end, the “tell the oiks anything that’ll get ’em riled up and keep ’em on your side” and the back end which is where the real action is.

    So, for example, the W. administration has been characterized by much chattering about faith and morals up front but actually represents a cabal of global oil interests. McPalin continues in this tradition — what they say and what they will actually do are very different. The gap’s made up by people skilled in mass psychology — spin doctors is how they used to call themselves.

    The current election climate is a bit weird because Obama’s running on a platform that’s not too different from McCain circa 2000. McCain’s had to drink the Party KoolAid so he’s now trying to push positions that he knows just don’t make sense. He’s been issued with a running made that’s completely off the wall — this whole trooper thing only scratches the surface.

    For more explanations of the American Way, read the book “It can’t happen here”. (Its a novel published in the mid 1930s, something of a classic.)

    Recommend? (35)
    Report abuse
    Clip | Link
    MeandYou
    Oct 28 08, 12:42am (about 17 hours ago)

    The effect is, it takes just a lunatic religious extremist like Al-Aqaida a lucky moment to expose the small mindedness tha exist in Washington.

    Recommend? (2)
    Report abuse
    Clip | Link
    SSDD
    Oct 28 08, 12:44am (about 17 hours ago)

    And, most important, to my mind–an American Media horde (especially inside-the-Washington Beltway) that lives and breathes and enables and sustains
    cheap, meaningless personality-celebrity politics. With this, of course,
    we have a Repuglicritocracy in America that both preys on, and feeds off,
    the Federal government (the people)!!!
    Leesburg, VA

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Categories

From Punto Press


PuntoPress_DisplayAd_REV

StatCounter

wordpress stats