Obama’s Reprehensible Rhetoric Against Single-Payer

Print Friendly

The Dems’ healthcare gambit backfires

Obama was never serious about getting a real healthcare reform passed.  He wanted (and still does) to have it both ways: to convince the public that the messy, ludicrous Rube Goldberg program he has allowed his minions to advance is the best possible solution to the healthcare mess, while also cutting deals with the insurance vultures behind closed doors.

•••••••••••

OBAMA-osloBy Matthew Rothschild, March 3, 2010

When Barack Obama gave his “this is it” speech on health care reform on March 3, he once again swerved out of his way to hit advocates of a single-payer system.

He said: “On one end of the spectrum, there are some who have suggested scrapping our system of private insurance and replacing it with government-run health care. Though many other countries have such a system, in America it would be neither practical nor realistic.”

The White House is attempting a late-hour maneuver, even demonizing the private insurers, to sell the public its version of “healthcare reform”, but the plan, when examined, despite a few improvements over the current calamitous system, remains a disgraceful concession to the idea of profit at the center of medical services.

You can argue about whether it is realistic politically but there should be no question whatsoever that it’s practical in the sense of being functional. It works well in other countries, including Canada, and there is no reason it can’t work well here. Canada’s health outcomes, and the health outcomes of every other advanced industrial country with government-run systems, are superior to ours.

Maybe Obama was using the “neither, nor” construction to try to strengthen his weak and illogical opposition to single-payer and even to a robust public option like Medicare for all who want it—and 65 percent of the American people do want that kind of a public option.

There is not that much difference between “practical” and “realistic” if by both he meant to say politically possible. I suppose he could have really stretched the sentence out by saying “government-run health care . . . would be neither practical nor realistic nor feasible nor possible nor doable nor achievable nor viable.”

But it would all mean the same thing. At bottom, he didn’t want to expend any political capital for it, or even for the robust public option.

Instead, he exploited advocates of a single-payer system as a foil to say, in not so many words, “I’m not an extremist like they are.”

He juxtaposed them with Republicans who want to “loosen regulations on the insurances companies.” And he did so in order to try to claim the middle ground, on the false and facile assumption that the middle ground is always the best ground.

Here’s how he put it: “I don’t believe we should give government bureaucrats or insurance company bureaucrats more control over health care in America.”

By damning “government bureaucrats,” Obama played right into the hands of the anti-government crowd and made any durable expansion of health care coverage all the more difficult. He also insulted every single federal employee in the Medicare and Medicaid and VA and Indian health programs.

This was reprehensible rhetoric.

Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.


2 comments on “Obama’s Reprehensible Rhetoric Against Single-Payer
  1. The president has said LOTS of really negative things about the health insurance industry. He says they are dishonest and that they only care about making money.

    Why does he want to give them 40,000,000 more customers?

  2. Obama is a perfect shill for corporate power, and the sooner people realize this the better for the country. Never mind that the nation’s rightwing seems even more disgusting. The bottom line is that both parties are OWNED by the plutocratic power of corporations and their retainers…It’s revolting and people should do something about this, and I mean whatever it takes to get this filthy hypocritical mafia off our backs. In Congress just about one of a few people fighting for single-payer is Dennis Kucinich. He deserves full support, no matter what otehr whores in the media or congress say about him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Categories

From Punto Press


PuntoPress_DisplayAd_REV

StatCounter

wordpress stats