When the Egyptian government created a partial communications blackout on Thursday, shutting Internet and cell-phone service , it asked for the cooperation of foreign mobile phone companies. UK-based Vodafone complied, saying it had no choice  but to cut service.
In a statement issued Saturday , Vodafone said the Egyptian government would have been able to shut the network itself anyway, all within the bounds of Egyptian law. Mobinil, another major provider, which is owned in part by France Telecom, also complied .
Did they have any choice?
“We don’t know,” said Cynthia Wong, of the Center for Democracy and Technology. “Certainly it shows how much leverage governments have over mobile phone companies in particular.”
Other reports suggest the government, at least in Egypt, likely could have shut down  the system whether providers cooperated or not. The website Computerworld reported  that while there is no “kill switch” that would shut all service, a government could physically sabotage equipment or worse. As Computerworld put it, “a government that licenses a mobile authority can threaten violence to individual cell towers or backhaul networks, or to employees working for the carrier.”
Vodafone may have been implying that Egypt would do just that if the company didn’t comply, saying a government shutdown would have meant a longer shutdown . Computerworld also reported  that France Telecom withdrew about 20 foreign employees from the country.
While governments have implemented partial shutdowns of telecommunications before, in Iran  and China , the scale of Egypt’s actions are unprecedented, Wong said. And with activists increasingly organizing through texts and Twitter, she said, more countries are likely to do the same in the future.
Multinational corporations may have little recourse when a government decides to shut down all service, but a number of companies, including Microsoft, Google and Yahoo! are trying to organize against such intrusions through the Global Network Initiative . The group, which includes advocacy organizations and investors as well, says increasing pressure from governments has led them to come up with a set of guiding principles to “protect and advance freedom of expression and privacy” in the telecom sector. It aims to help companies come up with a plan for how to deal with situations like what’s happening in Egypt before it occurs.
With interruptions of service in Egypt, it’s hard to tell how widespread and successful the crackdown has been. There was at least one report of BlackBerry users finding a way around  the blocks. One Internet service provider reportedly held out for days before shutting down  by Monday. And while cell service had supposedly resumed  after the weekend, CNN reports  the government has shut it again temporarily.
It’s also unclear whether the Egyptian government had a legal basis for its actions, as Vodafone claimed . But Wong said that if even if there were some law that allowed the crackdown, it would run counter to international human-rights principles.
“There are a set of human-rights norms around when governments can restrict free flow of information,” she said. “I would say this is pretty close to a violation.”